Question

Is it better to use RPA or BPM-based Automation for processes where System of Record is a Mainframe system?

I am currently assessing client processes where the System of Record is a set of Mainframe systems and they are performing the activities directly on mainframe for each case. The client has implemented some kind of integration between Pega and one of the mainframes, but are hesitant to proceed with any further integration with other mainframes, or even with the other modules within the same Mainframe which was integrated earlier.

In such a scenario, I want to understand if RPA like Openspan would be an quicker option to implement compared to the BPM solution considering that RPA doesn't involve any back-end integration between Pega and Mainframe databases. Also, kindly share the process/steps to integrate Pega with a Mainframe system, and difference in cost between the two approach,

1. Pega integration with Mainframe

2. RPA for the process steps and calling the RPA from Pega once case is received

**Moderation Team has archived post**

This post has been archived for educational purposes. Contents and links will no longer be updated. If you have the same/similar question, please write a new post.

Correct Answer
December 29, 2016 - 9:30am

This thread was handled offline by speaking to a member of the Sales Team.

Comments

Keep up to date on this post and subscribe to comments

December 21, 2016 - 10:55am

Hello,

Sorry for the delay as the Moderation Team worked to get a reply on this for you. I will send you a private message.

Thank you,

Marissa | Community Moderator | Pegasystems Inc.

Marissa | Community Moderator | Pegasystems Inc.

December 29, 2016 - 9:30am

This thread was handled offline by speaking to a member of the Sales Team.

Marissa | Community Moderator | Pegasystems Inc.