This thread is closed.
Published on April 13, 2012 - 2:33pm
Last updated October 18, 2012 - 9:47am
Discussion
Class Inheritance
Why do we have Direct Inheritance and Pattern Inheritance in Class Inheritance instead of either one of above ?
Please Clarify me........
Thanking you..........!
**Moderation Team has archived post**
This post has been archived for educational purposes. Contents and links will no longer be updated. If you have the same/similar question, please write a new post.
Comments
Keep up to date on this post and subscribe to comments
Pega
April 16, 2012 - 9:18am
Having "dual" inheritance provides a class with a bigger set of parent classes -- more "places" that it can inherit from.
So, indirectly, this means greater reuse of rules, less effort into developing new rules.
- reply
November 24, 2012 - 2:55am
Hi,
Main inheritance purpose is for Resuability.inheritance (direct and pattern) for Ruleresolution Purpose (to find Best instance Of rule).
- reply
- Org class inherited from Work- class
- Direct class inheritance of Implementation layer Data- and Int- and SvcInt- classes?
- Classes inheriting from Embed- base class can be concrete?
- Is it advisable to change the direct inheritance of a framework's data class to point to divisional's data class
- Is there an easy way to find the list of classes that inherit(pattern/direct) from work- class
